One of the major counter arguments to this claim is that regardless of the fact that some homosexual couples may not provide an ideal home for a foster child, it is more important that the most children possible find permanent homes.
That route for recognizing a fundamental right to same-sex marriage does not exist. Since homosexuality is not yet truly accepted in society, the children involved in these adoptions would undeniably endure thorough amounts of criticism and humiliation as a result of their family trees.
In the Louisiana case, plaintiffs argued that barring same-sex couples from marriage discriminates based on sexual orientation. However, the dilemma our nation is faced with is finding a way to open adoption to more couples while also keeping a sense of selectivity and exclusiveness in exactly who we allow to adopt.
Finally, the legalization of same-sex adoption would cause serious conflict with Catholic Adoption agencies, which preach catholic morals and beliefs to their foster children, one of which is that a father and mother must be male and female and is not accepted in any other form.
Although a large body of scientific evidence refutes these claims, the argument has persisted. This is a fundamental violation of the rights of a child.
In a homosexual "family" these benefits of proper development are deliberately withheld from the child. In the structure of a homosexual "family", that right of the child is methodically and deliberately denied.
I would also address this argument to people outside of the academic community who are unaware of the causes same sex adoption could potentially have on the children involved, in order to gain support for my side of the issue. The issue at hand is not anything regarding the homosexual community as a whole, or anything concerning same-sex marriage, but instead is simply the idea of a gay couple adopting a child.
In other words, Connor proposes that through considering legalizing same-sex adoption, it is evident that our nation has become more worried about being politically correct and tolerant, instead of focusing solely on what is the best situation for kids, and acting upon this realization.
Statistically speaking, the promiscuity of gay men living together is much higher than in a common father-mother relationship. Primarily, the legalization of same sex adoption would lead to the child being exposed to an short-term environment, seeing how many gay males or females, though involved in a steady relationship, are in a situation with their partner which reflects that of a boyfriend or girlfriend as opposed to a husband or wife.
Although twenty years is a long period of time, it is also important to think that the relationships these homosexuals describe are not as much of a commitment as marriage, and involve no vows. By thoroughly explaining and presenting these claims, I plan to validate my argument against same-sex adoption.
It is up to judges to responsibly interpret these protections and intervene in the democratic process when necessary. In his upholding of gay marriage bans in Michigan, Kentucky, Ohio, and Tennessee, Sutton wrote that by leaving this decision up to voters, states are instilling a sense of power in the people.
By discussing these three topics, I believe that the problematic nature of same-sex adoption will be revealed and understood. Furthermore, legalizing this issue would cause conflict within religious-based adoption agencies, such as Catholic organizations.
Possibly the most prominent and obvious con of same-sex adoption is the issue of whether homosexual couples can provide the same environment at home that a heterosexual, married couple can.
Adolescent girls who have grown up without a father, have greater proximity and distance problems to male peers and boys and more often become unintentionally pregnant. In the United States, no changes have been made to previous laws regarding this topic, which state that homosexual couples cannot adopt under any circumstances.
With the amount of adoptions at an all-time low, along with the gay rights movement at an all-time high, there has been an increase in pressure to allow same-sex couples to adopt children.Gay Adoption Rights: The debate. Print Reference this. Disclaimer: In the reflection of the gay adoption, there has been constant dispute on the issue of their custodies.
However, in light of this, the paper has brought forth a number of arguments that are against gay parents adopting kids.
Among the concrete reason I believe that gay. The research in favor of gay adopton includes two papers, one by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the second paper entitled “Lesbian and Gay Adoption Rights” an article from “Lesbian life” magazine. Gay Adoption Essay Examples.
1 page. An Arguments Against Gay Couple Adopting Child. words. 1 page. Gay and Lesbian Adoption Must End for the Sake of the Children.
words. 1 page. An Overview of the Arguments for the Case of Children Adoption in the Homosexual Unity. words. Ten reasons against adoption rights for homosexual couples. by Christl R. Vonholdt • Every child has a right to a mother and father.
In the structure of a homosexual "family", that right of the child is methodically and deliberately denied. Statistically speaking, the promiscuity of gay men living together is much higher than in a common.
An Argument Against Same-Sex Adoption This essay An Argument Against Same-Sex Adoption is available for you on Essayscom! Search Term Papers, College Essay Examples and Free Essays on Essayscom - full papers database.
Autor: 24 • April 19, • 2, Words (12 Pages) • 2, Views4/4(1). Argument Essay On Gay Adoption. The issue of adoption has caused much controversy in the United States. There are people who are for it and people who are against it. Each side uses many arguments to defend in what they believe.
People who believe that gay adoption is bad say that letting homosexuals adopt children is bad for the children and .Download